Thirtythree scientists are calling for an evident based and rational debate on electronic cigarettes. They think this is most neccesary because of the loads of misinformation and junk scientific papers which are floating around in scientific libraries and the internet on this issue. As a logical move these sincere scientistst
Dr. Brad Rodu, professor of medicine and tobacco control expert from the University of Louisville made a career battling forces responsible for promulgating suspect science in the field of tobacco harm reduction: there’s been no shortage of need for his effort. Regulators, public health agencies and colleagues in academia relentlessly
Now it is common knowledge that Prof. Glantz manipulated his scientific paper on e-cigarettes ” “Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health” , which was first retracted by JAHA. It appears that two another scientific papers by his hand contains
De intrekking van het wetenschappelijk “junk” onderzoek “Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assesment of Tobacco and Health” in het “Journal of American Heart Association (JAHA) is veel te laat uitgevoerd. Er is veel desinformatie gecreëerd door publicatie van dit wetenschappelijk rapport van prof.
The retraction of the junk scientific paper “Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health” by the Journal of American Heart Association is far to late executed. A lot of misinformation has been created by publishing this junk scientific paper written